全球主机交流论坛

标题: 上午的virmach抢购没忍住，买了一个3H8G的vps，测评一下。。。 [打印本页]

作者: hoodhmy 时间: 2021-9-18 12:44
标题: 上午的virmach抢购没忍住，买了一个3H8G的vps，测评一下。。。
$34.05/年
KVM - 1 GIGABIT
8064MB 内存
3 CPU 核数
25GB 固态容量 (RAID 10)
16000GB 流量
纽约水牛城地点
1 独立 IPv4

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode  : Standard Version : 1.1.7
Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model          : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores          : 3 Cores 2199.998 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache          : 4096 KB
OS                : CentOS 7.9.2009 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel             : 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64
Total Space       : 1.7 GB / 25.0 GB
Total RAM          : 178 MB / 7695 MB (189 MB Buff)
Total SWAP          : 0 MB / 255 MB
Uptime             : 0 days 0 hour 51 min
Load Average       : 0.05, 0.03, 0.05
TCP CC             : cubic
ASN & ISP          : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization       : Virtual Machine Solutions LLC
Location          : Buffalo, United States / US
Region             : New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 85.4 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 102 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 110 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 99.1 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name       Upload Speed    Download Speed    Latency
Speedtest.net 928.71 Mbit/s    430.21 Mbit/s    30.90 ms
Fast.com       0.00 Mbit/s    135.1 Mbit/s       -
Hefei 5G    CT  390.03 Mbit/s    289.31 Mbit/s    234.36 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT  14.81 Mbit/s    117.96 Mbit/s    232.83 ms
TianJin 5G CU  8.50 Mbit/s    43.68 Mbit/s       274.09 ms
Shanghai 5G  CU  342.42 Mbit/s    359.16 Mbit/s    244.90 ms
Guangzhou 5G CU  354.62 Mbit/s    273.48 Mbit/s    249.90 ms
Tianjin 5G CM  234.32 Mbit/s    515.59 Mbit/s    351.44 ms
Wuxi 5G    CM  350.41 Mbit/s    73.64 Mbit/s       291.51 ms
Nanjing 5G CM  496.98 Mbit/s    15.24 Mbit/s       270.47 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in  : 6 min 14 sec
Timestamp : 2021-09-18 10:31:12 GMT+8
Results    : ./superbench.log
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Share result:
· https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ae733148-abe9-44f1-b440-67e666ccb89b
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/29VHvmypB2/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: DirectSilent-VM: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Sep 7 14:49:57 UTC 2021
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
      x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
      x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
      x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
22:51:08 up  1:17,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.25, 0.31; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 17 2021 22:51:08 - 23:19:20
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    24896407.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   3256.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               502.9 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       104409.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          29301.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       363553.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            155639.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                40121.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            2512.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                1737.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   496.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      209059.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 24896407.8 2133.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    3256.0 592.0
Execl Throughput                               43.0       502.9 117.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    104409.1 263.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    29301.2 177.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0    363553.2 626.8
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0    155639.5 125.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    40121.3 100.3
Process Creation                               126.0    2512.2 199.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    1737.7 409.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0       496.8 828.0
System Call Overhead                         15000.0    209059.8 139.4
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        299.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 17 2021 23:19:20 - 23:47:40
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    65733054.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   9582.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            1599.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       260177.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          62043.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       848817.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            478630.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                123445.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            8219.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                5624.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   779.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      481591.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 65733054.9 5632.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    9582.7 1742.3
Execl Throughput                               43.0    1599.3 371.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3960.0    260177.6 657.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          1655.0    62043.6 374.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       5800.0    848817.4 1463.5
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0    478630.1 384.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    123445.9 308.6
Process Creation                               126.0    8219.4 652.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    5624.6 1326.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0       779.2 1298.7
System Call Overhead                         15000.0    481591.8 321.1
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        786.9

======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

作者: MSN 时间: 2021-9-18 12:46
这配置可以

作者: a512955123 时间: 2021-9-18 12:47

这配置可以

作者: bigcat 时间: 2021-9-18 12:49
这Unixbench分数竟然不敌AMD 1核

作者: suantong 时间: 2021-9-18 12:56
去年22刀，4h8g

作者: zxxx 时间: 2021-9-18 12:58
流量给得足

作者: weiai 时间: 2021-9-18 12:59
3h不抵1h，改得36刀干啥不好吃一顿也行

作者: citywar 时间: 2021-9-18 13:03
3核比不过别人一核

签名contabo 4核3000来分
斯巴达一核也有880来分

作者: lijihede 时间: 2021-9-18 13:04
最大的问题就是大水牛到国内的网速

作者: kevin007 时间: 2021-9-18 13:09
请我大佬这个怎么测试，用什么命令

作者: hoodhmy 时间: 2021-9-18 13:27

kevin007 发表于 2021-9-18 13:09
请我大佬这个怎么测试，用什么命令

我用的这两个
wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash

wget --no-check-certificate https://github.com/teddysun/across/raw/master/unixbench.sh
chmod +x unixbench.sh
./unixbench.sh

作者: Kilimanjaro 时间: 2021-9-18 13:43
请问这种黑五优惠机，以后续费也是优惠价吗？

作者: shunglay 时间: 2021-9-18 13:58

Kilimanjaro 发表于 2021-9-18 13:43
请问这种黑五优惠机，以后续费也是优惠价吗？

是的，但是感觉这个性价比不高

作者: Kilimanjaro 时间: 2021-9-18 14:43

shunglay 发表于 2021-9-18 13:58
是的，但是感觉这个性价比不高

谢谢，另外再请问一下KVM – 1 GIGABIT，这个虚拟化内存是包含在1152mb内存里面还是在单独另外给的呀？

作者: shunglay 时间: 2021-9-18 14:46

Kilimanjaro 发表于 2021-9-18 14:43
谢谢，另外再请问一下KVM – 1 GIGABIT，这个虚拟化内存是包含在1152mb内存里面还是在单独另外给的呀？

...

swap一般是不包括在标注的内存里的，swap你进系统都可以自己设置

作者: LikeOracle 时间: 2021-9-18 14:49
花钱的JJ都不是好jj

作者: 1号城管 时间: 2021-9-18 14:51
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: 用户 时间: 2021-9-18 15:31
你这机器能出吗？

作者: HiCEO 时间: 2021-9-18 15:49
看这个为啥不选HH的两年付优惠呢。。。2h8G一年差不多也这个价

作者: nebulabox 时间: 2021-9-18 16:33
你这个机器网络挺正常，IO比较慢，我前些日子买的夏季特惠机器，IO速度差不多是这个机器3倍。

作者: rkidc 时间: 2021-9-18 16:34

kevin007 发表于 2021-9-18 13:09
请我大佬这个怎么测试，用什么命令

Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html

作者: 三丫的 时间: 2021-9-18 16:36
大佬劝退

作者: liugogal 时间: 2021-9-18 16:37
rn的3h起码还有2000多分

作者: kevin007 时间: 2021-9-22 09:57
水牛城 2h2G，测速如何

CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores          : 2 Cores 2199.998 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache          : 4096 KB
OS                : CentOS 7.9.2009 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel             : 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64
Total Space       : 4.6 GB / 15.0 GB
Total RAM          : 371 MB / 1963 MB (556 MB Buff)
Total SWAP          : 0 MB / 255 MB
Uptime             : 4 days 10 hour 46 min
Load Average       : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
TCP CC             : cubic
ASN & ISP          : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization       : Virtual Machine Solutions LLC
Location          : Seattle, United States / US
Region             : Washington
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 158 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 400 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 434 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 330.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name       Upload Speed    Download Speed    Latency
Speedtest.net 926.06 Mbit/s    830.23 Mbit/s    0.50 ms
Fast.com       0.00 Mbit/s    131.3 Mbit/s       -
Nanjing 5G CT  171.62 Mbit/s    321.91 Mbit/s    174.98 ms
Hefei 5G    CT  213.72 Mbit/s    296.71 Mbit/s    245.96 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT  246.74 Mbit/s    13.88 Mbit/s       185.36 ms
TianJin 5G CU  470.40 Mbit/s    387.23 Mbit/s    165.58 ms
Shanghai 5G  CU  92.80 Mbit/s    286.71 Mbit/s    199.44 ms
Guangzhou 5G CU  426.87 Mbit/s    394.35 Mbit/s    208.40 ms
Tianjin 5G CM  FAILED Mbit/s    239.96 Mbit/s    367.51 ms
Wuxi 5G    CM  112.84 Mbit/s    10.42 Mbit/s       299.07 ms
Nanjing 5G CM  260.69 Mbit/s    37.76 Mbit/s       218.92 ms
Changsha 5G  CM  122.25 Mbit/s    34.28 Mbit/s       193.63 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in  : 6 min 35 sec
Timestamp : 2021-09-22 09:53:28 GMT+8
Results    : ./superbench.log

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://mjj.022333.xyz/)